Book Report 2
I read Tuck Everlastin. It is good. Beacause it has a lot of good words in it. It was written in 1975 and is 139 pages. Natalie Babbitt write the book.My teacher giave me the book.
The main character is Winnie. She is bored. The protagonist is Mae. She kidnap Winnie.
The story is about the fountain of youth. Winnie has to run away. She stays wityh the Tucks and they feed her pancakes. Mae hits the man in yellow and goes to jail. Winnie is learning how to appreciate the circle of life.
I learned that we should be careful what we wish for, because we might one day get it.
The book is something I recommend to you to read. It is filled with good words and metaphors and stuff. I thought that it would be good to read if you are ten.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
this person would get a 5/10 becuase the ideas were good but the sentances were not writen properly and could heve been better lots of the words were spelled wrong. some ideas are not in there.
tofer
By: Rachel
I would rate this book report 3/10. I would rate this book report 3/10 because there were no vocabulary terms, many grammatical errors, and there was a lack of structure in the piece. I thought that it was at a satisfctory level and the authour did not put enough time into their work.
mary-
I think this report deserves a three out of ten. The "ideas" were not connected at all, there were many errors, and the languge was simple and the errors got in the way of the meaning.
Tea,
Exemplar #2
My mark is 2 1/2 because this is a disaster! There is horrible spelling and grammar with the wrong use of punctuation. Many ideas were left in thought. I didn't enjoy reading this. Please try harder next time.
3
Good choise of book, but i don't think that you shared alot of info for me to injoy the report. The book report had many spelling mistake and there wasn't alot of good vocab words. It looked like you didn't put in 100% of yourself in the report so that why droped your mark.
by:nicholas
I would give this person a 3 out of 10 because, it is so simple, repetitive, is not connected at all, and has lots of spelling mistakes. I think that the person who wrote this should fail. Ya you heard me, FAIL!
Shay- I would give this book report a 4/10 because i noticed quite a few spelling errors and I noticed that there was not enough detail put into the ideas. The writing was skipped from idea to idea and didn't finish what it was talking about. In conclusion I think this book report needed work.
I think it deserves a 4. It is not very detailed and has way to many spelling errors. "They fed her pancakes" isn't relevent to the main ideas and who spells with wrong? This person likely wasn't likely paying attention or doesn't care about their work. This doesn't make me want to read this book.
Trevor
This was an OK report. Nothing to be proud of for sure. Although it was rough around the edges and has terrible vocabulary, it stayed on topic and described the book. I will give this a 5/10.
by Shupedog
By:Kylie
I read this book report and I would mark this book report as a 3/10 because there were many spelling errors, alot of bad grammer, and lack of structure of this book report. I do not think that the person who wrote this put a lot of effort into thier work.
Natalie- I am going to give this book report a 4 out of 10. I chose this mark because the writing had many errors and very little information. The tasks are completed but many seem effortless and careless.
Sophia-Exemplar #2
i am going to give this report a 4/10. Im am going to do this because there is very little information about all the topics. There are spelling mistakes and improper sentances. There is not a good effort, it was too short and it was not intriguing.
Tamzin,
Exemplar #2
I think that this book report deserves two and a half, this may seem harsh, but this report was ridiculous. The ideas included were choppy and were not explained thoroughly enough. As well as this, there were many spelling errors, and this confused me. In conclusion, this was a perplexing report to read.
Post a Comment